For
some, this is may be an innocuously easy question. But for me this has remained,
till date, the bane of my life.
One
day, I was asked by a novice trainee (who shall remain unnamed), “What do you
do at work?”
No
sooner had my auditory cortex received this signal that my brain cells got all
tangled up into paroxysms of thought. Simply put, an infinite stretch of time
passed in between those seconds in which my mind feebly attempted to frame a
response, to answer this mother of all questions.
My
standard response for the low IQ people goes something along the lines of “I am
the guy who is partly responsible for some of those ads you see everyday”. But,
given that this trainee’s LinkedIn profile indicated a 98 Mensa, my brain knew that
it would not be able to fob him off with such a simplistic answer.
The
next formulation from the dorsolateral parts of my brain went along the lines
of “I am the guy who designs the strategy that informs the advertising that you
see everyday”. This response, unfortunately, begs the question “what kind of
strategy?”
This
is where things begin to get interesting, because there are planners, and there
are planners. In the space of any given eight hours of a working day, I could
be wearing any one of four hats, not to mention the twenty-four permutations
between them.
Veering
between the extreme left and the extreme right of the planner brain, there are
four cognition states – the marketing planner, the brand planner, the
communication planner and the creative planner.
Good
things happen when each of them are conscious of the other, while signing a
peace treaty to keep respectful distance between themselves. However, bad
things happen when each of these dudes (cognition states) decides that it is
better than the others.
Or,
even worse, if each decides to do the job of the other. You may
be tempted to ask, “what is the worst that can be?” The ill effects could vary
from the pedestrian problem of poor motivation up to utter desecration and destruction
of brand value.
However,
keeping in spirit with new-age gurus who encourage us to think positively, we
shall veer away from these downright pessimistic scenarios and think of all the
positive things that could happen if Jack does not behave like Jill.
For
one, there would be horses for courses. Or, in other words, one would not try
to fit a round peg in a square hole. (Is this becoming an article on
analogies?). A realization of these four differing profiles would help direct bespoke
skillsets and competencies to the client problems at hand. On the other side of
the same coin, it would help clarify the planner’s mind on his own career path.
This clarity would contribute immensely to both the efficiency and the
effectiveness of the planner.
Another
chain of reasoning could question whether the four profiles are mutually
exclusive? The sushi knife evades us on this question. The author submits that
these profiles are exclusive on inputs, while they may bleed into each other on
outputs. Put differently, while problems are exclusively addressed by the
appropriate skillset, the proposed solutions may bleed into adjacent profiles.
For example, a market portfolio solution may need to get expressed in brand
terms, to illustrate it in to an unskilled stakeholder. However, bleeding
beyond adjacent profiles would not be without risk. After all, one would loathe
presenting a portfolio solution with creative campaigns!
But
forgive me, for we drift far away from the original question “What do you do,
at work?”
Alas,
for the educated, there is no simple answer to this question. The best intelligent
elevator pitch would be along the lines of “I am the guy who designs
appropriate solutions, which could be marketing, brand, communications or creative
strategy, that ultimately informs the products, brands and advertising that you
see everyday”.
Or,
put simply, I am a ‘creator of gestalt for consumption’.
I
wonder, how many people would understand that?
In
the very least, now you know, why this question has tormented me for all my
working life.
This article was reprinted here: http://www.afaqs.com/planning-room/article/133_-Planner-framework
No comments:
Post a Comment